What constitutes the proper place of trial if there is no written agreement?

The proper place of trial, also known as venue, is generally determined based on where the events giving rise to the lawsuit occurred, especially in the absence of a written agreement. In many legal contexts, including civil procedure, venue is designed to ensure that trials are held in locations that are relevant to the case and convenient for the parties and witnesses involved.

Choosing the county where the events occurred allows for a more just and practical consideration of the circumstances surrounding the dispute, as local juries may have a better understanding of the context. For example, if a car accident happened in a specific county, it makes sense for the case to be tried in that county, as the residents there may be better informed about local conditions and regulations related to the case.

Other options may not properly reflect the most sensible or practical venue for trial. For instance, selecting a plaintiff's choice or the defendant's residence may not necessarily meet the criteria for an appropriate venue if those locations are unrelated to the events that generated the lawsuit. Moreover, the state capital is unlikely to be relevant unless specific statutes or legal provisions dictate otherwise, which is not common in procedural law regarding civil cases. Thus, the location of the events becomes a crucial factor in determining the appropriate venue for trial.