What is the standard of proof required in a civil case?

The standard of proof required in a civil case is known as the "preponderance of the evidence." This means that the party with the burden of proof must demonstrate that their claims are more likely true than not. In practical terms, this standard is understood as establishing that there is a greater than 50% chance that the allegations are accurate.

This standard is less stringent than those used in criminal cases, where the prosecution must prove its case "beyond a reasonable doubt," reflecting a higher level of certainty due to the potential consequences of a criminal conviction. Similarly, "clear and convincing evidence" is a higher standard often applied in specific civil matters, such as cases involving fraud or termination of parental rights, but is not the general standard for most civil cases. "Reasonable suspicion," on the other hand, is applicable in criminal law concerning the justification for a brief investigative stop and does not apply to civil cases.

Thus, understanding that the preponderance of the evidence is the appropriate standard in civil litigation helps clarify how evidence is evaluated and the burden of proof placed on the parties involved.