What is typically the goal of a summary jury trial?

The goal of a summary jury trial is to influence negotiations through advisory findings. This type of trial presents a condensed form of trial where evidence is presented to a jury, which then renders an advisory verdict. The verdict is not legally binding but serves as a guide for the parties involved, helping them to gauge how a full trial may go and thereby facilitating negotiations.

By providing an early glimpse into how a jury might view the case, both parties can make more informed decisions about settlement negotiations or adjustments to their strategies. This approach can lead to resolutions outside of a full trial, making it a valuable tool in the civil litigation process.

The other options do not capture the essence of a summary jury trial. For instance, obtaining a legally binding verdict is not a characteristic of this process; instead, the findings are advisory. While a summary jury trial can lead to a more expedited process, that is not its primary goal. Similarly, it does not exist to provide legal advice to the parties, as that function is outside the scope of what a jury can offer in a trial setting.