Which of the following is NOT a factor for forum non conveniens consideration?

In the context of forum non conveniens, the primary factors considered focus on the convenience of the parties and witnesses, as well as public interest factors relevant to the case. The doctrine of forum non conveniens allows a court to dismiss a case if it believes that another forum would be more appropriate to hear the case, balancing various factors to determine which forum would be the most suitable.

Convenience for witnesses is an important consideration, as it addresses the accessibility and willingness of key individuals to appear in court, which can significantly impact the ability to present a case effectively. Public interest factors, such as the burden on local courts and the local interest in resolving disputes arising within their jurisdiction, also play a crucial role in deciding the most suitable forum.

On the other hand, the amount of the judgment at stake is not a consideration under the forum non conveniens analysis. While the monetary stakes of a case may influence other procedural decisions, they do not impact the fundamental inquiry of whether a different jurisdiction would offer a more convenient or appropriate setting for the dispute. This is why the judgment amount at stake is identified as not being a factor for forum non conveniens considerations.

Understanding these distinctions helps to clarify the focus of forum non conveniens doctrines and emphasizes how courts prioritize